Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

castsoftware.com source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/castsoftware.com

castsoftware.com

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

69 of 21,320 measured prompts cited castsoftware.com.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 8 of 38 measured topics

Product Teams and customer-facing Integrations10 of 420 measured prompts Aztec and Aleo and Oasis Sapphire6 of 218 measured prompts Consulting Firms and Transformation4 of 99 measured prompts Construction software and suppliers3 of 703 measured prompts Medallia and Iterate and Discussio3 of 273 measured prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private3 of 294 measured prompts Research Community and Customer Community and Community Research3 of 93 measured prompts User Feedback and Feedback Tool3 of 23 measured prompts

View public topics →

Cited pages

Showing 1 of 1 safe exact pages

https://www.castsoftware.com/69 prompts

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

learn.castsoftware.com69 shared prompts · Compare reddit.com48 shared prompts · Compare arxiv.org26 shared prompts · Compare aikido.dev14 shared prompts · Compare cloudflare.com14 shared prompts · Compare capterra.com13 shared prompts · Compare mulesoft.com13 shared prompts · Compare prismatic.io13 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Global payroll and international work453 eligible prompts Automation AI and AI Agents342 eligible prompts Identity Verification251 eligible prompts Contract Review and Counsel and Word240 eligible prompts App Development and Software Development and Web223 eligible prompts Shipping Container and Container Home210 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →