Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

codat.io source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/codat.io

codat.io

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

46 of 21,320 measured prompts cited codat.io.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 8 of 12 measured topics

Help SaaS and SaaS Products and Integrations17 of 198 measured prompts Product Teams and customer-facing Integrations17 of 420 measured prompts Custom Fields and Field Mappings2 of 59 measured prompts Virtual Cards and Corporate Card2 of 62 measured prompts Accounting Software and Cloud Tools and Small Accounting1 of 74 measured prompts Agentnative and Agents and Integration Platform1 of 60 measured prompts AI Orchestration and AI Workflows and Warehouses1 of 150 measured prompts App Connections and Settings and Thousands Apps1 of 25 measured prompts

View public topics →

Cited pages

Showing 1 of 6 safe exact pages

https://www.codat.io/37 prompts

Search this website’s pages →

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

reddit.com43 shared prompts · Compare merge.dev41 shared prompts · Compare prismatic.io38 shared prompts · Compare tryfinch.com38 shared prompts · Compare workato.com37 shared prompts · Compare nango.dev35 shared prompts · Compare mulesoft.com32 shared prompts · Compare useparagon.com31 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Construction software and suppliers703 eligible prompts Automation AI and AI Agents342 eligible prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private294 eligible prompts Medallia and Iterate and Discussio273 eligible prompts Identity Verification251 eligible prompts Contract Review and Counsel and Word240 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →