Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

docs.github.com source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/docs.github.com

docs.github.com

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

79 of 21,320 measured prompts cited docs.github.com.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 8 of 31 measured topics

Workflow Automation and Automation Platform9 of 228 measured prompts OAuth and Refresh and Integrations8 of 98 measured prompts Open Source and Source Tool8 of 152 measured prompts Github Actions and Circleci6 of 7 measured prompts Vpc and Data Boundaries and AI Platforms6 of 132 measured prompts Integration Library and Support Integration5 of 109 measured prompts API Credentials and Authentication and OAuth3 of 35 measured prompts Insights Repository and Cpg3 of 24 measured prompts

View public topics →

Cited pages

Showing 0 of 62 safe exact pages

No safe exact pages are available for this website.

Search this website’s pages →

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

reddit.com46 shared prompts · Compare arxiv.org38 shared prompts · Compare github.com37 shared prompts · Compare learn.microsoft.com25 shared prompts · Compare aikido.dev16 shared prompts · Compare cloudflare.com14 shared prompts · Compare datadoghq.com13 shared prompts · Compare docs.aws.amazon.com12 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Construction software and suppliers703 eligible prompts Global payroll and international work453 eligible prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private294 eligible prompts Medallia and Iterate and Discussio273 eligible prompts Identity Verification251 eligible prompts Contract Review and Counsel and Word240 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →