Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

scalekit.com source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/scalekit.com

scalekit.com

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

83 of 21,320 measured prompts cited scalekit.com.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 8 of 23 measured topics

OAuth and Refresh and Integrations29 of 98 measured prompts API Credentials and Authentication and OAuth15 of 35 measured prompts Help SaaS and SaaS Products and Integrations5 of 198 measured prompts Automation AI and AI Agents3 of 342 measured prompts Product Teams and customer-facing Integrations3 of 420 measured prompts Update and Postcall CRM3 of 145 measured prompts Agent Email and Email Threads and Assistant Thread2 of 68 measured prompts Agentnative and Agents and Integration Platform2 of 60 measured prompts

View public topics →

Cited pages

Showing 1 of 34 safe exact pages

https://www.scalekit.com/27 prompts

Search this website’s pages →

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

reddit.com75 shared prompts · Compare cloudflare.com45 shared prompts · Compare workos.com43 shared prompts · Compare mulesoft.com41 shared prompts · Compare arxiv.org39 shared prompts · Compare auth0.com37 shared prompts · Compare learn.microsoft.com37 shared prompts · Compare withone.ai34 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Construction software and suppliers703 eligible prompts Global payroll and international work453 eligible prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private294 eligible prompts Medallia and Iterate and Discussio273 eligible prompts Identity Verification251 eligible prompts Contract Review and Counsel and Word240 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →