Skip to content

What AI Cites

Explore Methodology About

Search websites, topics, or cited URLs

Loading…

What AI Cites

Methodology Coverage About Corrections Licensing review

userpilot.com source evidence — What AI Cites

Explore/Website/userpilot.com

userpilot.com

Measured panel · Aug 2, 2026

158 of 21,320 measured prompts cited userpilot.com.

Observed citation support, not traffic, demand, quality, or a forecast. Methodology

Topics

Showing 8 of 45 measured topics

Customer Onboarding and Onboarding Platforms35 of 140 measured prompts User Feedback and Feedback Tool15 of 23 measured prompts App Reviews and App Store10 of 201 measured prompts Medallia and Iterate and Discussio10 of 273 measured prompts Testing Software and User Testing9 of 36 measured prompts Ux Research and Research Repository8 of 95 measured prompts Usability Testing and Testing Platform6 of 49 measured prompts Remote User and User Testing and Testing Platform5 of 22 measured prompts

View public topics →

Cited pages

Showing 1 of 35 safe exact pages

https://userpilot.com/95 prompts

Search this website’s pages →

Cited alongside

Showing 8 relationships

reddit.com147 shared prompts · Compare capterra.com69 shared prompts · Compare guideflow.com59 shared prompts · Compare wifitalents.com58 shared prompts · Compare g2.com57 shared prompts · Compare planhat.com55 shared prompts · Compare pendo.io51 shared prompts · Compare toolradar.com51 shared prompts · Compare

Not observed for supported topics

Supported measured topics where this website was not observed. This is an evidence boundary, not a recommendation or proof of a content gap.

Showing 6 topics

Construction software and suppliers703 eligible prompts Global payroll and international work453 eligible prompts Automation AI and AI Agents342 eligible prompts Privacy Blockchain and Private294 eligible prompts Contract Review and Counsel and Word240 eligible prompts Enterprise Marketing and Accountbased Marketing and Campaigns237 eligible prompts

Own this website? Request a licensing review →